netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 8/8] selftests: net: Add port split test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200603201638.608cfdb0@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Wed, 3 Jun 2020 20:16:38 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:     Danielle Ratson <danieller@...lanox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, michael.chan@...adcom.com,
        jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, saeedm@...lanox.com, leon@...nel.org,
        jiri@...lanox.com, idosch@...lanox.com, snelson@...sando.io,
        drivers@...sando.io, andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...il.com,
        mlxsw@...lanox.com, Petr Machata <petrm@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 8/8] selftests: net: Add port split test

On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 11:12:51 -0700 Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Any reason why this is written in python versus shell?

Perhaps personal preference of the author :) 

I'd be curious to hear the disadvantages, is python too big for
embedded targets?