[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4Bzb4WeHSgM0up99wPV75Fq-tmSMZ5Q=Kw7vkD11YqFRS3w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:19:14 -0700
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: bump version to 0.0.10
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 9:18 AM Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 8:59 AM Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com> wrote:
> >
> > Let's start new cycle with another libbpf version bump.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
> > ---
> > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
> > index f732c77b7ed0..3b37b8867cec 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
> > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
> > @@ -270,3 +270,6 @@ LIBBPF_0.0.9 {
> > ring_buffer__new;
> > ring_buffer__poll;
> > } LIBBPF_0.0.8;
> > +
> > +LIBBPF_0.0.10 {
> > +} LIBBPF_0.0.9;
>
> How about 0.1.0 instead?
sure, why not?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists