lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200618.201130.941014011043746603.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Thu, 18 Jun 2020 20:11:30 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     olteanv@...il.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...il.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, joakim.tjernlund@...inera.com,
        madalin.bucur@....nxp.com, fido_max@...ox.ru,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net 0/2] Reapply DSA fix for dpaa-eth with proper
 Fixes: tag

From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 18:19:08 +0300

> From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
> 
> Joakim notified me that this fix breaks stable trees.
> It turns out that my assessment about who-broke-who was wrong.
> The real Fixes: tag should have been:
> 
> Fixes: 060ad66f9795 ("dpaa_eth: change DMA device")
> 
> which changes the device on which SET_NETDEV_DEV is made.
> 
> git describe --tags 060ad66f97954
> v5.4-rc3-783-g060ad66f9795
> 
> Which means that it shouldn't have been backported to 4.19 and below.
> This series reverts the commit with the misleading commit message, and
> reapplies it with a corrected one. The resulting code is exactly the
> same, but now, the revert should make it to the stable trees (along with
> the bad fix), and the new fix should only make it down to v5.4.y.
> 
> Changes in v2:
> Corrected the reversed sysfs paths in the new commit description.

This is so messy.

What's done is done, just submit the necessary revert to -stable
if necessary and let's not just change things back and forth
because then we'll have two commits which make identical changes
and each having a different Fixes: tag which is confusing.

Thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ