[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e6d0bfc5-9d75-2dc9-2bfa-671c32cb0b7c@rempel-privat.de>
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 07:47:16 +0200
From: Oleksij Rempel <linux@...pel-privat.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Philippe Schenker <philippe.schenker@...adex.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Kazuya Mizuguchi <kazuya.mizuguchi.ks@...esas.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 1/5] dt-bindings: net: renesas,ravb: Document internal
clock delay properties
Hi Geert,
Am 19.06.20 um 21:15 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
> Some EtherAVB variants support internal clock delay configuration, which
> can add larger delays than the delays that are typically supported by
> the PHY (using an "rgmii-*id" PHY mode, and/or "[rt]xc-skew-ps"
> properties).
>
> Add properties for configuring the internal MAC delays.
> These properties are mandatory, even when specified as zero, to
> distinguish between old and new DTBs.
>
> Update the example accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/net/renesas,ravb.txt | 29 ++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/renesas,ravb.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/renesas,ravb.txt
> index 032b76f14f4fdb38..488ada78b6169b8e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/renesas,ravb.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/renesas,ravb.txt
> @@ -64,6 +64,18 @@ Optional properties:
> AVB_LINK signal.
> - renesas,ether-link-active-low: boolean, specify when the AVB_LINK signal is
> active-low instead of normal active-high.
> +- renesas,rxc-delay-ps: Internal RX clock delay.
may be it make sense to add a generic delay property for MACs and PHYs?
> + This property is mandatory and valid only on R-Car Gen3
> + and RZ/G2 SoCs.
> + Valid values are 0 and 1800.
> + A non-zero value is allowed only if phy-mode = "rgmii".
> + Zero is not supported on R-Car D3.
> +- renesas,txc-delay-ps: Internal TX clock delay.
> + This property is mandatory and valid only on R-Car H3,
> + M3-W, M3-W+, M3-N, V3M, and V3H, and RZ/G2M and RZ/G2N.
> + Valid values are 0 and 2000.
In the driver i didn't found sanity check for valid values.
> + A non-zero value is allowed only if phy-mode = "rgmii".
> + Zero is not supported on R-Car V3H.> Example:
>
> @@ -105,8 +117,10 @@ Example:
> "ch24";
> clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 812>;
> power-domains = <&cpg>;
> - phy-mode = "rgmii-id";
> + phy-mode = "rgmii";
> phy-handle = <&phy0>;
> + renesas,rxc-delay-ps = <0>;
> + renesas,txc-delay-ps = <2000>;
>
> pinctrl-0 = <ðer_pins>;
> pinctrl-names = "default";
> @@ -115,18 +129,7 @@ Example:
> #size-cells = <0>;
>
> phy0: ethernet-phy@0 {
> - rxc-skew-ps = <900>;
> - rxdv-skew-ps = <0>;
> - rxd0-skew-ps = <0>;
> - rxd1-skew-ps = <0>;
> - rxd2-skew-ps = <0>;
> - rxd3-skew-ps = <0>;
> - txc-skew-ps = <900>;
> - txen-skew-ps = <0>;
> - txd0-skew-ps = <0>;
> - txd1-skew-ps = <0>;
> - txd2-skew-ps = <0>;
> - txd3-skew-ps = <0>;
> + rxc-skew-ps = <1500>;
I'm curios, how this numbers ware taken?
Old configurations was:
TX delay:
(txd*-skew-ps = 0) == -420ns
(txc-skew-ps = 900) == 0ns
resulting delays 0.420ns
RX delay:
(rxd*-skew-ps = 0) == -420ns
(rxc-skew-ps = 900) == 0ns
internal delay 1.2 + 420ns will be 1.62ns
I was not able to find actual delay values provided by the MAC. But from your patches it looks like 2ns.
So, end result will be:
TXID = 2.4ns
RXID = 3.62ns
Both values seems to be a bit out of spec. New values are:
TXID = PHY 0ns + MAC 2.0ns
RXID =
(rxd*-skew-ps = no change) == 0ns
(rxc-skew-ps = 1500) == +600ns
internal delay 1.2 + 600ns = 1.8ns
From the PHY point of view, it is RGMII_RXID mode. Are you sure, RGMII_ID is not working for you?
Till now the numbers was not looking as a fine tuning.
I assume, it is better to use proper phy-mode instead of skew-ps values. I feel like no one had time
to understand real configured values in this PHY.
> reg = <0>;
> interrupt-parent = <&gpio2>;
> interrupts = <11 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
>
--
Regards,
Oleksij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists