netdev - Re: [net-next 07/10] net/mlx5e: Move TC-specific function definitions into MLX5_CLS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 23 Jun 2020 21:26:02 +0000
From:   Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
To:     "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>, Maor Dickman <maord@...lanox.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 07/10] net/mlx5e: Move TC-specific function definitions
 into MLX5_CLS_ACT

On Tue, 2020-06-23 at 14:03 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 12:52:26 -0700 Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> > From: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
> > 
> > en_tc.h header file declares several TC-specific functions in
> > CONFIG_MLX5_ESWITCH block even though those functions are only
> > compiled
> > when CONFIG_MLX5_CLS_ACT is set, which is a recent change. Move
> > them to
> > proper block.
> > 
> > Fixes: d956873f908c ("net/mlx5e: Introduce kconfig var for TC
> > support")
> 
> and here... do those break build or something?

No, just redundant exposure and leftovers.
Do you want me to remove the Fixes Tags ?
Personally I don't mind fixes tags for something this basic,
but your call.. 

> 
> > Signed-off-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Maor Dickman <maord@...lanox.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>