[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <de6bf72d-d4fd-9a62-c082-c82179d1f4fe@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:32:22 -0700
From: "Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>
To: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/epoll: Enable non-blocking busypoll with epoll timeout
of 0
Adding Dave, Eric for review and see if we can get this in via net-next
as this is mainly useful for networking workloads doing busypoll.
Thanks
Sridhar
On 6/19/2020 11:13 AM, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
> This patch triggers non-blocking busy poll when busy_poll is enabled and
> epoll is called with a timeout of 0 and is associated with a napi_id.
> This enables an app thread to go through napi poll routine once by calling
> epoll with a 0 timeout.
>
> poll/select with a 0 timeout behave in a similar manner.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>
> ---
> fs/eventpoll.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c
> index 12eebcdea9c8..5f55078d6381 100644
> --- a/fs/eventpoll.c
> +++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
> @@ -1847,6 +1847,19 @@ static int ep_poll(struct eventpoll *ep, struct epoll_event __user *events,
> eavail = ep_events_available(ep);
> write_unlock_irq(&ep->lock);
>
> + /*
> + * Trigger non-blocking busy poll if timeout is 0 and there are
> + * no events available. Passing timed_out(1) to ep_busy_loop
> + * will make sure that busy polling is triggered only once and
> + * only if sysctl.net.core.busy_poll is set to non-zero value.
> + */
> + if (!eavail) {
> + ep_busy_loop(ep, timed_out);
> + write_lock_irq(&ep->lock);
> + eavail = ep_events_available(ep);
> + write_unlock_irq(&ep->lock);
> + }
> +
> goto send_events;
> }
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists