netdev - Re: [PATCH net 0/4] Fixes for SJA1105 DSA tc-gate action

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200625.160712.1069325238499341512.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Thu, 25 Jun 2020 16:07:12 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     olteanv@...il.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        vivien.didelot@...il.com, po.liu@....com, xiaoliang.yang_1@....com,
        kuba@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/4] Fixes for SJA1105 DSA tc-gate action

From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 16:54:43 +0300

> From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
> 
> This small series fixes 2 bugs in the tc-gate implementation:
> 1. The TAS state machine keeps getting rescheduled even after removing
>    tc-gate actions on all ports.
> 2. tc-gate actions with only one gate control list entry are installed
>    to hardware with an incorrect interval of zero, which makes the
>    switch erroneously drop those packets (since the configuration is
>    invalid).
> 
> To keep the code palatable, a forward-declaration was avoided by moving
> some code around in patch 1/4. I hope that isn't too much of an issue.

Series applied, thank you.