[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200626052223.GB19286@gauss3.secunet.de>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 07:22:23 +0200
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@...erus.ca>,
"Sabrina Dubroca" <sd@...asysnail.net>,
Tobias Brunner <tobias@...ongswan.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 ipsec] xfrm: policy: match with both mark and mask on
user interfaces
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 04:40:29PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> In commit ed17b8d377ea ("xfrm: fix a warning in xfrm_policy_insert_list"),
> it would take 'priority' to make a policy unique, and allow duplicated
> policies with different 'priority' to be added, which is not expected
> by userland, as Tobias reported in strongswan.
>
> To fix this duplicated policies issue, and also fix the issue in
> commit ed17b8d377ea ("xfrm: fix a warning in xfrm_policy_insert_list"),
> when doing add/del/get/update on user interfaces, this patch is to change
> to look up a policy with both mark and mask by doing:
>
> mark.v == pol->mark.v && mark.m == pol->mark.m
>
> and leave the check:
>
> (mark & pol->mark.m) == pol->mark.v
>
> for tx/rx path only.
>
> As the userland expects an exact mark and mask match to manage policies.
>
> v1->v2:
> - make xfrm_policy_mark_match inline and fix the changelog as
> Tobias suggested.
>
> Fixes: 295fae568885 ("xfrm: Allow user space manipulation of SPD mark")
> Fixes: ed17b8d377ea ("xfrm: fix a warning in xfrm_policy_insert_list")
> Reported-by: Tobias Brunner <tobias@...ongswan.org>
> Tested-by: Tobias Brunner <tobias@...ongswan.org>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Applied, thanks a lot Xin!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists