netdev - Re: [PATCH] Remove handhelds.org links and email addresses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 30 Jun 2020 08:31:40 +0200
From:   "Alexander A. Klimov" <grandmaster@...klimov.de>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
Cc:     corbet@....net, aaro.koskinen@....fi, tony@...mide.com,
        linux@...linux.org.uk, daniel@...que.org, haojian.zhuang@...il.com,
        robert.jarzmik@...e.fr, kgene@...nel.org, krzk@...nel.org,
        dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, lee.jones@...aro.org,
        ulf.hansson@...aro.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        b.zolnierkie@...sung.com, j.neuschaefer@....net,
        mchehab+samsung@...nel.org, gustavo@...eddedor.com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, yanaijie@...wei.com,
        daniel.vetter@...ll.ch, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
        Julia.Lawall@...ia.fr, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
        viresh.kumar@...aro.org, arnd@...db.de, jani.nikula@...el.com,
        yuehaibing@...wei.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove handhelds.org links and email addresses



Am 29.06.20 um 23:10 schrieb Wolfram Sang:
> Hi Alexander,
> 
> thanks for trying to fix this, yet I have some doubts.
> 
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 10:31:21PM +0200, Alexander A. Klimov wrote:
>> Rationale:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/20200626110706.7b5d4a38@lwn.net/
> 
> I think we need some text here. Clicking on a link to understand what a
> patch is about is not comfortable. You can add the link with a Link: tag
> for additional information.
Fine. I can easily make a v2 patch, but first...

> 
> Removing stale email addresses may have some value, but removing...
> 
>>   Compaq's Bootldr + John Dorsey's patch for Assabet support
>> -(http://www.handhelds.org/Compaq/bootldr.html)
> 
> ... information like this is not good. 'Wayback machine' still has
> copies in case someone wants to look at where the infos came from.
If we shall not remove *this link*, maybe we shall not remove *all links*?

@Jon You've kinda initiated the patch, what's your opinion? Bad 
squatters or good Wayback machine?

> 
>> - * Copyright 2004-2005  Phil Blundell <pb@...dhelds.org>
>> + * Copyright 2004-2005  Phil Blundell
> 
> This is an OK case in my book...
> 
> 
>> -MODULE_AUTHOR("Phil Blundell <pb@...dhelds.org>");
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Phil Blundell");
> 
> ... same here ...
> 
>> @@ -435,7 +435,6 @@
>>                              case a PCI bridge (DEC chip 21152). The value of
>>                              'pb' is now only initialized if a de4x5 chip is
>>                              present.
>> -                           <france@...dhelds.org>
> 
> This is kind of a signature and should be kept IMO.
What for? An email address is for someone who'd like to send an email to 
it. At the moment handhelds.org doesn't even have an MX record.

> 
>>    * 2001/07/23: <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
>> - *	- Hand merge version from handhelds.org CVS tree.  See patch
>> + *	- Hand merge version from CVS tree.  See patch
> 
> That information may be useful.
Again: What for? For visiting it and thinking like damn, it's gone?

> 
> 
>>   /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
>>   /* -*- linux-c -*-
>> - *
>> - * (C) 2003 zecke@...dhelds.org
> 
> Removing copyright is a bad idea.
IMAO the CREDITS file is for (c) headers.
If you didn't submit a patch for that - your problem.

If you disagree, I can look up git blame.

> 
> Probably some comment blocks are cruft meanwhile and can be removed as a
> whole. That can be discussed. But removing only the handhelds.org part
> makes most parts worse IMHO.
> 
> Thanks and happy hacking,
> 
>     Wolfram
>