[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpVFN3f8OCy-zWWV+ZmKomdn8Cm3dFtbux0figRCDsU9tw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 12:02:39 -0700
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: wenxu <wenxu@...oud.cn>
Cc: Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/sched: act_mirred: fix fragment the packet after
defrag in act_ct
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 7:55 PM <wenxu@...oud.cn> wrote:
>
> From: wenxu <wenxu@...oud.cn>
>
> The fragment packets do defrag in act_ct module. The reassembled packet
> over the mtu in the act_mirred. This big packet should be fragmented
> to send out.
This is too brief. Why act_mirred should handle the burden introduced by
act_ct? And why is this 158-line change targeting -net not -net-next?
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists