lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpVFN3f8OCy-zWWV+ZmKomdn8Cm3dFtbux0figRCDsU9tw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 30 Jun 2020 12:02:39 -0700
From:   Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:     wenxu <wenxu@...oud.cn>
Cc:     Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/sched: act_mirred: fix fragment the packet after
 defrag in act_ct

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 7:55 PM <wenxu@...oud.cn> wrote:
>
> From: wenxu <wenxu@...oud.cn>
>
> The fragment packets do defrag in act_ct module. The reassembled packet
> over the mtu in the act_mirred. This big packet should be fragmented
> to send out.

This is too brief. Why act_mirred should handle the burden introduced by
act_ct? And why is this 158-line change targeting -net not -net-next?

Thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ