[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <10af044d-c51b-9b85-04b9-ea97a3c3ebdb@ucloud.cn>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 10:33:33 +0800
From: wenxu <wenxu@...oud.cn>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/sched: act_mirred: fix fragment the packet after
defrag in act_ct
On 7/1/2020 3:02 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 7:55 PM <wenxu@...oud.cn> wrote:
>> From: wenxu <wenxu@...oud.cn>
>>
>> The fragment packets do defrag in act_ct module. The reassembled packet
>> over the mtu in the act_mirred. This big packet should be fragmented
>> to send out.
> This is too brief. Why act_mirred should handle the burden introduced by
> act_ct? And why is this 158-line change targeting -net not -net-next?
Hi Cong,
In the act_ct the fragment packets will defrag to a big packet and do conntrack things.
But in the latter filter mirred action, the big packet normally send over the mtu of outgoing device.
So in the act_mirred send the packet should fragment.
I think this is a bugfix in the net branch the act_ct handle with fragment will always fail.
BR
wenxu
>
> Thanks.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists