netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 00/16] sfc: prerequisites for EF100 driver, part 3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200702.144756.1230939399441159039.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Thu, 02 Jul 2020 14:47:56 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     kuba@...nel.org
Cc:     ecree@...arflare.com, linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 00/16] sfc: prerequisites for EF100 driver,
 part 3

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 14:06:48 -0700

> On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 17:25:17 +0100 Edward Cree wrote:
>> Changes in v2:
>> * Patch #1: use efx_mcdi_set_mtu() directly, instead of as a fallback,
>>   in the mtu_only case (Jakub)
>> * Patch #3: fix symbol collision in non-modular builds by renaming
>>   interrupt_mode to efx_interrupt_mode (kernel test robot)
>> * Patch #6: check for failure of netif_set_real_num_[tr]x_queues (Jakub)
>> * Patch #12: cleaner solution for ethtool drvinfo (Jakub, David)
> 
> Thanks, the last two patches with functions with no callers slightly
> worrying, but okay:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>

Series applied, thanks everyone.