netdev - [PATCH v2 net-next 1/6] net: dsa: felix: clarify the intention of writes to MII

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200704124507.3336497-2-olteanv@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat,  4 Jul 2020 15:45:02 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     andrew@...n.ch, f.fainelli@...il.com, vivien.didelot@...il.com,
        claudiu.manoil@....com, alexandru.marginean@....com,
        ioana.ciornei@....com, linux@...linux.org.uk
Subject: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/6] net: dsa: felix: clarify the intention of writes to MII_BMCR

From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>

The driver appears to write to BMCR_SPEED and BMCR_DUPLEX, fields which
are read-only, since they are actually configured through the
vendor-specific IF_MODE (0x14) register.

But the reason we're writing back the read-only values of MII_BMCR is to
alter these writable fields:

BMCR_RESET
BMCR_LOOPBACK
BMCR_ANENABLE
BMCR_PDOWN
BMCR_ISOLATE
BMCR_ANRESTART

In particular, the only field which is really relevant to this driver is
BMCR_ANENABLE. Clarify that intention by spelling it out, using
phy_set_bits and phy_clear_bits.

The driver also made a few writes to BMCR_RESET and BMCR_ANRESTART which
are unnecessary and may temporarily disrupt the link to the PHY. Remove
them.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
---
Changes in v2:
Patch is new.

 drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix_vsc9959.c | 11 +++--------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix_vsc9959.c b/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix_vsc9959.c
index 2067776773f7..9f4c8343652f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix_vsc9959.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix_vsc9959.c
@@ -815,7 +815,7 @@ static void vsc9959_pcs_init_sgmii(struct phy_device *pcs,
 		phy_write(pcs, ENETC_PCS_LINK_TIMER2,
 			  ENETC_PCS_LINK_TIMER2_VAL);
 
-		phy_write(pcs, MII_BMCR, BMCR_ANRESTART | BMCR_ANENABLE);
+		phy_set_bits(pcs, MII_BMCR, BMCR_ANENABLE);
 	} else {
 		int speed;
 
@@ -845,10 +845,7 @@ static void vsc9959_pcs_init_sgmii(struct phy_device *pcs,
 			  ENETC_PCS_IF_MODE_SGMII_EN |
 			  ENETC_PCS_IF_MODE_SGMII_SPEED(speed));
 
-		/* Yes, not a mistake: speed is given by IF_MODE. */
-		phy_write(pcs, MII_BMCR, BMCR_RESET |
-					 BMCR_SPEED1000 |
-					 BMCR_FULLDPLX);
+		phy_clear_bits(pcs, MII_BMCR, BMCR_ANENABLE);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -882,9 +879,7 @@ static void vsc9959_pcs_init_2500basex(struct phy_device *pcs,
 		  ENETC_PCS_IF_MODE_SGMII_EN |
 		  ENETC_PCS_IF_MODE_SGMII_SPEED(ENETC_PCS_SPEED_2500));
 
-	phy_write(pcs, MII_BMCR, BMCR_SPEED1000 |
-				 BMCR_FULLDPLX |
-				 BMCR_RESET);
+	phy_clear_bits(pcs, MII_BMCR, BMCR_ANENABLE);
 }
 
 static void vsc9959_pcs_init_usxgmii(struct phy_device *pcs,
-- 
2.25.1