[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200714090048.GG183694@krava>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 11:00:48 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the bpf-next tree
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 12:16:08PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the bpf-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> ld: warning: orphan section `.BTF_ids' from `kernel/trace/bpf_trace.o' being placed in section `.BTF_ids'
> ld: warning: orphan section `.BTF_ids' from `kernel/bpf/btf.o' being placed in section `.BTF_ids'
> ld: warning: orphan section `.BTF_ids' from `kernel/bpf/stackmap.o' being placed in section `.BTF_ids'
> ld: warning: orphan section `.BTF_ids' from `net/core/filter.o' being placed in section `.BTF_ids'
> ld: warning: orphan section `.BTF_ids' from `kernel/trace/bpf_trace.o' being placed in section `.BTF_ids'
> ld: warning: orphan section `.BTF_ids' from `kernel/bpf/btf.o' being placed in section `.BTF_ids'
> ld: warning: orphan section `.BTF_ids' from `kernel/bpf/stackmap.o' being placed in section `.BTF_ids'
> ld: warning: orphan section `.BTF_ids' from `net/core/filter.o' being placed in section `.BTF_ids'
> ld: warning: orphan section `.BTF_ids' from `kernel/trace/bpf_trace.o' being placed in section `.BTF_ids'
> ld: warning: orphan section `.BTF_ids' from `kernel/bpf/btf.o' being placed in section `.BTF_ids'
> ld: warning: orphan section `.BTF_ids' from `kernel/bpf/stackmap.o' being placed in section `.BTF_ids'
> ld: warning: orphan section `.BTF_ids' from `net/core/filter.o' being placed in section `.BTF_ids'
>
> Presumably ntroduced by the merge of the resolve_btfids branch.
missing one more #ifdef.. chage below fixes it for me,
it's squashed with the fix for the arm build, I'll post
both fixes today
thanks,
jirka
---
diff --git a/include/linux/btf_ids.h b/include/linux/btf_ids.h
index fe019774f8a7..2f9754a4ab2b 100644
--- a/include/linux/btf_ids.h
+++ b/include/linux/btf_ids.h
@@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
#ifndef _LINUX_BTF_IDS_H
#define _LINUX_BTF_IDS_H
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF
+
#include <linux/compiler.h> /* for __PASTE */
/*
@@ -21,7 +23,7 @@
asm( \
".pushsection " BTF_IDS_SECTION ",\"a\"; \n" \
".local " #symbol " ; \n" \
-".type " #symbol ", @object; \n" \
+".type " #symbol ", STT_OBJECT; \n" \
".size " #symbol ", 4; \n" \
#symbol ": \n" \
".zero 4 \n" \
@@ -83,5 +85,12 @@ asm( \
".zero 4 \n" \
".popsection; \n");
+#else
+
+#define BTF_ID_LIST(name) u32 name[5];
+#define BTF_ID(prefix, name)
+#define BTF_ID_UNUSED
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF */
#endif
diff --git a/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/Makefile b/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/Makefile
index 948378ca73d4..a88cd4426398 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/Makefile
+++ b/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/Makefile
@@ -16,6 +16,20 @@ else
MAKEFLAGS=--no-print-directory
endif
+# always use the host compiler
+ifneq ($(LLVM),)
+HOSTAR ?= llvm-ar
+HOSTCC ?= clang
+HOSTLD ?= ld.lld
+else
+HOSTAR ?= ar
+HOSTCC ?= gcc
+HOSTLD ?= ld
+endif
+AR = $(HOSTAR)
+CC = $(HOSTCC)
+LD = $(HOSTLD)
+
OUTPUT ?= $(srctree)/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/
LIBBPF_SRC := $(srctree)/tools/lib/bpf/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists