[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bfa03cf8613ada508774a2e6e89b9b01bfd968dd.camel@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 20:06:15 +0000
From: "Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
To: "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 0/7] udp_tunnel: convert Intel drivers with
shared tables
On Wed, 2020-07-22 at 14:22 -0700, Tony Nguyen wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 18:27 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > This set converts Intel drivers which have the ability to spawn
> > multiple netdevs, but have only one UDP tunnel port table.
> >
> > Appropriate support is added to the core infra in patch 1,
> > followed by netdevsim support and a selftest.
> >
> > The table sharing works by core attaching the same table
> > structure to all devices sharing the table. This means the
> > reference count has to accommodate potentially large values.
> >
> > Once core is ready i40e and ice are converted. These are
> > complex drivers, and I don't have HW to test so please
> > review..
>
> I'm requesting our developers to take a look over and validation to
> test the ice and i40e patches. I will report back when I get results.
Would you mind if I pick these patches up into Jeff's tree? It will
make it easier to test that way.
Thanks,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists