[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200724005224.GA29920@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 10:52:24 +1000
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: "Gong, Sishuai" <sishuai@...due.edu>,
"tgraf@...g.ch" <tgraf@...g.ch>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Sousa da Fonseca, Pedro Jose" <pfonseca@...due.edu>
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: potential concurrency bug in rhashtable.h
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 05:34:15PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> Sure, but __rht_ptr() is used with different RCU checks,
> I guess a that adding these lockdep conditions will make
> a patch more invasive.
Yes it is large but the only substantial change is to __rht_ptr
and its callers. Everything else is just juggling RCU markings.
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists