netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 21/21] netgpu/nvidia: add Nvidia plugin for netgpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 28 Jul 2020 14:47:38 -0400
From:   "Chris Mason" <clm@...com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 21/21] netgpu/nvidia: add Nvidia plugin for netgpu

On 28 Jul 2020, at 13:27, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 01:18:48PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
>>> come after in the future.
>>
>> Jonathan, I think we need to do a better job talking about patches 
>> that are
>> just meant to enable possible users vs patches that we actually hope 
>> the
>> upstream kernel to take.  Obviously code that only supports out of 
>> tree
>> drivers isn???t a good fit for the upstream kernel.  From the point 
>> of view
>> of experimenting with these patches, GPUs benefit a lot from this
>> functionality so I think it does make sense to have the enabling 
>> patches
>> somewhere, just not in this series.
>
> Sorry, but his crap is built only for this use case, and that is what
> really pissed people off as it very much looks intentional.

No, we’ve had workloads asking for better zero copy solutions for 
ages.  The goal is to address both this specialized workload and the 
general case zero copy tx/rx.

-chris