netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/2] XDP multi buffer helpers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 28 Jul 2020 11:48:35 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
Cc:     sameehj@...zon.com, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        dwmw@...zon.com, zorik@...zon.com, matua@...zon.com,
        saeedb@...zon.com, msw@...zon.com, aliguori@...zon.com,
        nafea@...zon.com, gtzalik@...zon.com, netanel@...zon.com,
        alisaidi@...zon.com, benh@...zon.com, akiyano@...zon.com,
        ndagan@...zon.com, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
        kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com, andriin@...com,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...omium.org, hawk@...nel.org,
        shayagr@...zon.com, lorenzo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/2] XDP multi buffer helpers

On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 14:33:27 +0200 Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:56:51PM +0000, sameehj@...zon.com wrote:
> > From: Sameeh Jubran <sameehj@...zon.com>
> > 
> > This series is based on the series that Lorenzo sent [0].  
> 
> What is your final design for multi buffer support in XDP?
> Why don't you provide a single RFC that is fully functional but instead
> you're sending a bunch of separate RFCs?

+1

are we expecting a new attachment type?