[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200728114835.3eaa8d49@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 11:48:35 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
Cc: sameehj@...zon.com, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
dwmw@...zon.com, zorik@...zon.com, matua@...zon.com,
saeedb@...zon.com, msw@...zon.com, aliguori@...zon.com,
nafea@...zon.com, gtzalik@...zon.com, netanel@...zon.com,
alisaidi@...zon.com, benh@...zon.com, akiyano@...zon.com,
ndagan@...zon.com, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com, andriin@...com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...omium.org, hawk@...nel.org,
shayagr@...zon.com, lorenzo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/2] XDP multi buffer helpers
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 14:33:27 +0200 Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:56:51PM +0000, sameehj@...zon.com wrote:
> > From: Sameeh Jubran <sameehj@...zon.com>
> >
> > This series is based on the series that Lorenzo sent [0].
>
> What is your final design for multi buffer support in XDP?
> Why don't you provide a single RFC that is fully functional but instead
> you're sending a bunch of separate RFCs?
+1
are we expecting a new attachment type?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists