netdev - Re: [net-next PATCH v7 0/6] ACPI support for dpaa2 MAC driver.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200728.173951.1166639369727479900.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Tue, 28 Jul 2020 17:39:51 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     calvin.johnson@....nxp.com
Cc:     rafael@...nel.org, lenb@...nel.org, Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com,
        guohanjun@...wei.com, sudeep.holla@....com, ahs3@...hat.com,
        jeremy.linton@....com, linux@...linux.org.uk, jon@...id-run.com,
        cristian.sovaiala@....com, ioana.ciornei@....com, andrew@...n.ch,
        andy.shevchenko@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        madalin.bucur@....nxp.com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux.cj@...il.com, Paul.Yang@....com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v7 0/6] ACPI support for dpaa2 MAC driver.

From: Calvin Johnson <calvin.johnson@....nxp.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 19:53:58 +0530

>  This patch series provides ACPI support for dpaa2 MAC driver.
>  This also introduces ACPI mechanism to get PHYs registered on a
>  MDIO bus and provide them to be connected to MAC.
> 
>  Previous discussions on this patchset is available at:
>  https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20200715090400.4733-1-calvin.johnson@oss.nxp.com/T/#t
> 
>  Patch "net: dpaa2-mac: Add ACPI support for DPAA2 MAC driver" depends on
>  https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lpieralisi/linux.git/commit/?h=acpi/for-next&id=c279c4cf5bcd3c55b4fb9709d9036cd1bfe3beb8
>  Remaining patches are independent of the above patch and can be applied without
>  any issues.

This really needs to be reviewed by phy/phylink people.

>  Device Tree can be tested on LX2160A-RDB with the below change which is also
> available in the above referenced patches:
> 
> --- a/drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-bus.c
> @@ -931,6 +931,7 @@ static int fsl_mc_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         if (error < 0)
>                 goto error_cleanup_mc_io;
> 
> +       mc_bus_dev->dev.fwnode = pdev->dev.fwnode;
>         mc->root_mc_bus_dev = mc_bus_dev;
>         return 0;

I don't know how you expect me to handle this dependency in the networking
tree.