netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] s390/qeth: updates 2020-07-30

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200730163903.002a49d6@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Thu, 30 Jul 2020 16:39:03 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] s390/qeth: updates 2020-07-30

On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 17:01:17 +0200 Julian Wiedmann wrote:
> Hi Dave & Jakub,
> 
> please apply the following patch series for qeth to netdev's net-next tree.
> 
> This primarily brings some modernization to the RX path, laying the
> groundwork for smarter RX refill policies.
> Some of the patches are tagged as fixes, but really target only rare /
> theoretical issues. So given where we are in the release cycle and that we
> touch the main RX path, taking them through net-next seems more appropriate.

First 2 patches look good to me:

Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>