netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: make destructors more robust by handling ERR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 29 Jul 2020 21:20:51 -0700
From:   Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
To:     Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
Cc:     bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
        Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: make destructors more robust by handling
 ERR_PTR(err) cases

On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 4:22 PM Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com> wrote:
>
> Most of libbpf "constructors" on failure return ERR_PTR(err) result encoded as
> a pointer. It's a common mistake to eventually pass such malformed pointers
> into xxx__destroy()/xxx__free() "destructors". So instead of fixing up
> clean up code in selftests and user programs, handle such error pointers in
> destructors themselves. This works beautifully for NULL pointers passed to
> destructors, so might as well just work for error pointers.
>
> Suggested-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>

Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>