lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200731211733.GA25665@chelsio.com>
Date:   Sat, 1 Aug 2020 02:47:38 +0530
From:   Rahul Lakkireddy <rahul.lakkireddy@...lsio.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Ganji Aravind <ganji.aravind@...lsio.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, vishal@...lsio.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] cxgb4: Add support to flash firmware config
 image

On Friday, July 07/31/20, 2020 at 11:00:08 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 16:39:04 +0530 Ganji Aravind wrote:
> > On Thursday, July 07/30/20, 2020 at 16:23:35 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 20:41:38 +0530 Ganji Aravind wrote:  
> > > > Update set_flash to flash firmware configuration image
> > > > to flash region.  
> > > 
> > > And the reason why you need to flash some .ini files separately is?  
> > 
> > Hi Jakub,
> > 
> > The firmware config file contains information on how the firmware
> > should distribute the hardware resources among NIC and
> > Upper Layer Drivers(ULD), like iWARP, crypto, filtering, etc.
> > 
> > The firmware image comes with an in-built default config file that
> > distributes resources among the NIC and all the ULDs. However, in
> > some cases, where we don't want to run a particular ULD, or if we
> > want to redistribute the resources, then we'd modify the firmware
> > config file and then firmware will redistribute those resources
> > according to the new configuration. So, if firmware finds this
> > custom config file in flash, it reads this first. Otherwise, it'll
> > continue initializing the adapter with its own in-built default
> > config file.
> 
> Sounds like something devlink could be extended to do.
> 
> Firmware update interface is not for configuration.

I thought /lib/firmware is where firmware related files need to be
placed and ethtool --flash needs to be used to program them to
their respective locations on adapter's flash.

Note that we don't have devlink support in our driver yet. And, we're
a bit confused here on why this already existing ethtool feature needs
to be duplicated to devlink.

Thanks,
Rahul

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ