[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200731211733.GA25665@chelsio.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2020 02:47:38 +0530
From: Rahul Lakkireddy <rahul.lakkireddy@...lsio.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Ganji Aravind <ganji.aravind@...lsio.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, vishal@...lsio.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] cxgb4: Add support to flash firmware config
image
On Friday, July 07/31/20, 2020 at 11:00:08 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 16:39:04 +0530 Ganji Aravind wrote:
> > On Thursday, July 07/30/20, 2020 at 16:23:35 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 20:41:38 +0530 Ganji Aravind wrote:
> > > > Update set_flash to flash firmware configuration image
> > > > to flash region.
> > >
> > > And the reason why you need to flash some .ini files separately is?
> >
> > Hi Jakub,
> >
> > The firmware config file contains information on how the firmware
> > should distribute the hardware resources among NIC and
> > Upper Layer Drivers(ULD), like iWARP, crypto, filtering, etc.
> >
> > The firmware image comes with an in-built default config file that
> > distributes resources among the NIC and all the ULDs. However, in
> > some cases, where we don't want to run a particular ULD, or if we
> > want to redistribute the resources, then we'd modify the firmware
> > config file and then firmware will redistribute those resources
> > according to the new configuration. So, if firmware finds this
> > custom config file in flash, it reads this first. Otherwise, it'll
> > continue initializing the adapter with its own in-built default
> > config file.
>
> Sounds like something devlink could be extended to do.
>
> Firmware update interface is not for configuration.
I thought /lib/firmware is where firmware related files need to be
placed and ethtool --flash needs to be used to program them to
their respective locations on adapter's flash.
Note that we don't have devlink support in our driver yet. And, we're
a bit confused here on why this already existing ethtool feature needs
to be duplicated to devlink.
Thanks,
Rahul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists