lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 30 Jul 2020 17:55:04 -0700
From:   Xie He <xie.he.0141@...il.com>
To:     Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux X25 <linux-x25@...r.kernel.org>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/net/wan/lapbether: Use needed_headroom instead of hard_header_len

On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 5:24 PM Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> Sure, I can do that:
>
> Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>

Thank you so much for your review, Brian!

> I guess x25 is basically an abandoned project, if you're coming to me for this?

Yes, it does seem to me that X.25 is unmaintained. I'm submitting
patches for it because I'm personally interested in X.25 and I want to
fix things that I find to be having issues. But it's very hard for me
to do so because it's hard to find reviewers for X.25 code. So I
really appreciate that you review this patch. Thanks!

I don't know if it is the right thing to continue submitting patches
for X.25, or we should just keep the code as is. Maybe the kernel
community can have a discussion some time to decide what to do with
it.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists