[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <26681884-43fa-65b7-4832-ef9d757e8c0b@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 17:30:46 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, Aaron Conole <aconole@...hat.com>,
Numan Siddique <nusiddiq@...hat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@....org>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Lourdes Pedrajas <lu@...o.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/6] ipv4: route: Ignore output interface in FIB
lookup for PMTU route
On 8/3/20 2:52 PM, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
> index a01efa062f6b..c14fd8124f57 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/route.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
> @@ -1050,6 +1050,7 @@ static void ip_rt_update_pmtu(struct dst_entry *dst, struct sock *sk,
> struct flowi4 fl4;
>
> ip_rt_build_flow_key(&fl4, sk, skb);
> + fl4.flowi4_oif = 0; /* Don't make lookup fail for encapsulations */
> __ip_rt_update_pmtu(rt, &fl4, mtu);
> }
>
>
Can this be limited to:
if (skb &&
netif_is_bridge_port(skb->dev) || netif_is_ovs_port(skb->dev))
fl4.flowi4_oif = 0;
I'm not sure we want to reset oif for all MTU updates.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists