[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4c711720-b4ff-6f09-61cb-2d305daa69c8@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 16:06:50 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
mst@...hat.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
sean.j.christopherson@...el.com, wanpengli@...cent.com
Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, eli@...lanox.com, shahafs@...lanox.com,
parav@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 4/6] vhost_vdpa: implement IRQ offloading in vhost_vdpa
On 2020/7/31 下午2:55, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
> +static void vhost_vdpa_setup_vq_irq(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u16 qid)
> +{
> + struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = &v->vqs[qid];
> + const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = v->vdpa->config;
> + struct vdpa_device *vdpa = v->vdpa;
> + int ret, irq;
> +
> + spin_lock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
> + irq = ops->get_vq_irq(vdpa, qid);
Btw, this assumes that get_vq_irq is mandatory. This looks wrong since
there's no guarantee that the vDPA device driver can see irq. And this
break vdpa simulator.
Let's add a check and make it optional by document this assumption in
the vdpa.h.
Thanks
> + if (!vq->call_ctx.ctx || irq < 0) {
> + spin_unlock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
> + return;
> + }
> +
Powered by blists - more mailing lists