[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1aebeab4-6de1-1776-065f-01fb4bafcd79@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 16:12:42 +0800
From: "Zhu, Lingshan" <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
mst@...hat.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
sean.j.christopherson@...el.com, wanpengli@...cent.com
Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, eli@...lanox.com, shahafs@...lanox.com,
parav@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 4/6] vhost_vdpa: implement IRQ offloading in vhost_vdpa
On 8/5/2020 4:06 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2020/7/31 下午2:55, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
>> +static void vhost_vdpa_setup_vq_irq(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u16 qid)
>> +{
>> + struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = &v->vqs[qid];
>> + const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = v->vdpa->config;
>> + struct vdpa_device *vdpa = v->vdpa;
>> + int ret, irq;
>> +
>> + spin_lock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
>> + irq = ops->get_vq_irq(vdpa, qid);
>
>
> Btw, this assumes that get_vq_irq is mandatory. This looks wrong since
> there's no guarantee that the vDPA device driver can see irq. And this
> break vdpa simulator.
>
> Let's add a check and make it optional by document this assumption in
> the vdpa.h.
fix soon. Thanks!
>
> Thanks
>
>
>> + if (!vq->call_ctx.ctx || irq < 0) {
>> + spin_unlock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists