[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200806182612.1390883-1-sdf@google.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 11:26:12 -0700
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf] bpf: remove inline from bpf_do_trace_printk
I get the following error during compilation on my side:
kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function 'bpf_do_trace_printk':
kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:386:34: error: function 'bpf_do_trace_printk' can never be inlined because it uses variable argument lists
static inline __printf(1, 0) int bpf_do_trace_printk(const char *fmt, ...)
^
Fixes: ac5a72ea5c89 ("bpf: Use dedicated bpf_trace_printk event instead of trace_printk()")
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
---
kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index cb91ef902cc4..a8d4f253ed77 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(trace_printk_lock);
#define BPF_TRACE_PRINTK_SIZE 1024
-static inline __printf(1, 0) int bpf_do_trace_printk(const char *fmt, ...)
+static __printf(1, 0) int bpf_do_trace_printk(const char *fmt, ...)
{
static char buf[BPF_TRACE_PRINTK_SIZE];
unsigned long flags;
--
2.28.0.236.gb10cc79966-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists