lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 17 Aug 2020 13:13:55 -0700
From:   Johan Knöös <jknoos@...gle.com>
To:     Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
Cc:     Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Gregory Rose <gvrose8192@...il.com>,
        "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@...il.com>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        ovs dev <dev@...nvswitch.org>, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        rcu <rcu@...r.kernel.org>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: openvswitch: introduce common code for flushing flows

On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 12:48 AM Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 3:28 AM Johan Knöös <jknoos@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 3:53 PM David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com
> > > Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 17:56:39 +0800
> > >
> > > > From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
> > > >
> > > > To avoid some issues, for example RCU usage warning and double free,
> > > > we should flush the flows under ovs_lock. This patch refactors
> > > > table_instance_destroy and introduces table_instance_flow_flush
> > > > which can be invoked by __dp_destroy or ovs_flow_tbl_flush.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 50b0e61b32ee ("net: openvswitch: fix possible memleak on destroy flow-table")
> > > > Reported-by: Johan Knöös <jknoos@...gle.com>
> > > > Reported-at: https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-discuss/2020-August/050489.html
> > > > Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
> > >
> > > Applied, thank you.
> >
> > Tonghao, does the following change to your commit make sense to be
> > able to apply it on 5.6.14 (e3ac9117b18596b7363d5b7904ab03a7d782b40c)?
> Not applied cleanly, if necessary I can send v3 for 5.6.14.

That would be appreciated. Thanks!

> > @@ -393,7 +387,7 @@ void ovs_flow_tbl_destroy(struct flow_table *table)
> >
> >         free_percpu(table->mask_cache);
> >         kfree_rcu(rcu_dereference_raw(table->mask_array), rcu);
> > -       table_instance_destroy(table, ti, ufid_ti, false);
> > +       table_instance_destroy(ti, ufid_ti);
> >  }
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards, Tonghao

Powered by blists - more mailing lists