[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpUQtof+dQseFjS6fxucUZe5tkhUW5EvK+XtZE=cRRq4-A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 13:29:40 -0700
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>,
network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jon Maloy <jmaloy@...hat.com>,
Ying Xue <ying.xue@...driver.com>,
tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tipc: not enable tipc when ipv6 works as a module
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 12:55 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> TIPC=m and IPV6=m builds just fine.
>
> Having tipc autoload ipv6 is a different problem. (IMO)
>
>
> This Kconfig entry:
> menuconfig TIPC
> tristate "The TIPC Protocol"
> depends on INET
> + depends on IPV6 || IPV6=n
>
> says:
> If IPV6=n, TIPC can be y/m/n.
> If IPV6=y/m, TIPC is limited to whatever IPV6 is set to.
Hmm, nowadays we _do_ have IPV6=y on popular distros.
So this means TIPC would have to be builtin after this patch??
Still sounds harsh, right?
At least on my OpenSUSE I have CONFIG_IPV6=y and
CONFIG_TIPC=m.
> TIPC cannot be =y unless IPV6=y.
Interesting, I never correctly understand that "depends on"
behavior.
But even if it builds, how could TIPC module find and load
IPV6 module? Does IPV6 module automatically become its
dependency now I think?
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists