[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7c627a43-4339-cb08-c051-340100466033@solarflare.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 16:18:51 +0100
From: Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
To: <linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net] sfc: fix boolreturn.cocci warning and rename function
check_fcs() was returning bool as 0/1, which was a sign that the sense
of the function was unclear: false was good, which doesn't really match
a name like 'check_$thing'. So rename it to ef100_has_fcs_error(), and
use proper booleans in the return statements.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_rx.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_rx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_rx.c
index 012925e878f4..85207acf7dee 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_rx.c
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ bool ef100_rx_buf_hash_valid(const u8 *prefix)
return PREFIX_FIELD(prefix, RSS_HASH_VALID);
}
-static bool check_fcs(struct efx_channel *channel, u32 *prefix)
+static bool ef100_has_fcs_error(struct efx_channel *channel, u32 *prefix)
{
u16 rxclass;
u8 l2status;
@@ -46,11 +46,11 @@ static bool check_fcs(struct efx_channel *channel, u32 *prefix)
if (likely(l2status == ESE_GZ_RH_HCLASS_L2_STATUS_OK))
/* Everything is ok */
- return 0;
+ return false;
if (l2status == ESE_GZ_RH_HCLASS_L2_STATUS_FCS_ERR)
channel->n_rx_eth_crc_err++;
- return 1;
+ return true;
}
void __ef100_rx_packet(struct efx_channel *channel)
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ void __ef100_rx_packet(struct efx_channel *channel)
prefix = (u32 *)(eh - ESE_GZ_RX_PKT_PREFIX_LEN);
- if (check_fcs(channel, prefix) &&
+ if (ef100_has_fcs_error(channel, prefix) &&
unlikely(!(efx->net_dev->features & NETIF_F_RXALL)))
goto out;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists