lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 27 Aug 2020 12:27:32 +0300
From:   Kalle Valo <>
To:     Larry Finger <>
Cc:     Joe Perches <>, Pkshih <>,
        "linux-wireless\" <>,
        "davem\" <>,
        "netdev\" <>,
        "linux-kernel\" <>,
        "kuba\" <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] rtlwifi: Remove unnecessary parenthese in rtl_dbg uses

Larry Finger <> writes:

> On 7/27/20 9:52 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Mon, 2020-07-27 at 09:04 +0000, Pkshih wrote:
>>> So, I think you would like to have parenthesis intentionally.
>>> If so,
>>> test1 ? : (test2 ? :)
>>> would be better.
>>> If not,
>>> test1 ? : test2 ? :
>>> may be what you want (without any parenthesis).
>> Use whatever style you like, it's unimportant to me
>> and it's not worth spending any real time on it.
> If you are so busy, why did you jump in with patches that you knew I
> was already working on? You knew because you critiqued my first
> submission.

Yeah, I don't understand this either. First stepping on Larry's work and
when after getting review comments claiming being busy and not caring is

> @Kalle: Please drop my contributions in the sequence "PATCH v2 00/15]
> rtlwifi: Change RT_TRACE into rtl_dbg for all drivers".

Is there a technical reason for that? I prefer that patchset more,
nicely split in smaller patches and it's fully available from patchwork.

Patch 15 had a build problem but I can drop that for now, it can be
resent separately:


Powered by blists - more mailing lists