[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1a23235e40b8089629ca784d8e33851b715a6599.camel@perches.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 03:52:42 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
Cc: Pkshih <pkshih@...ltek.com>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] rtlwifi: Remove unnecessary parenthese in rtl_dbg
uses
On Thu, 2020-08-27 at 12:27 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net> writes:
> > On 7/27/20 9:52 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2020-07-27 at 09:04 +0000, Pkshih wrote:
> > > > So, I think you would like to have parenthesis intentionally.
> > > > If so,
> > > > test1 ? : (test2 ? :)
> > > > would be better.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > If not,
> > > > test1 ? : test2 ? :
> > > > may be what you want (without any parenthesis).
> > >
> > > Use whatever style you like, it's unimportant to me
> > > and it's not worth spending any real time on it.
> >
> > If you are so busy, why did you jump in with patches that you knew I
> > was already working on? You knew because you critiqued my first
> > submission.
>
> Yeah, I don't understand this either. First stepping on Larry's work and
> when after getting review comments claiming being busy and not caring is
> contradicting.
I didn't say I was busy, I said I didn't care.
And it's not stepping on anyone's work, it's
a trivial contribution. Take it or not.
It's been months btw, the pace of the work isn't
particularly fast here.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists