[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ+HfNgsP+DhQ16N3N4VtXNbmyE8yhZU7XFBG6gPimm17196pg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 16:51:52 +0200
From: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, josef@...icpanda.com,
bpoirier@...e.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 2/5] bpf: Introduce sleepable BPF programs
On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 at 00:02, Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
>
[...]
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index 6f5a9f51cc03..3ebfdb7bd427 100644
[...]
>
> +/* non exhaustive list of sleepable bpf_lsm_*() functions */
> +BTF_SET_START(btf_sleepable_lsm_hooks)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_LSM
> +BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_file_mprotect)
> +BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bprm_committed_creds)
> +#endif
> +BTF_SET_END(btf_sleepable_lsm_hooks)
> +
I'm getting:
FAILED unresolved symbol btf_sleepable_lsm_hooks
when CONFIG_BPF_LSM is not set.
Adding a BTF_UNUSED_ID unconditionally to the set helps, but I'm on a
BTF limb here, so there might be a more correct/obvious workaround
here...
Björn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists