lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 31 Aug 2020 08:51:55 -0700
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     daniel@...earbox.net, paulmck@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com
Subject: [PATCH v2 bpf-next] bpf: Fix build without BPF_SYSCALL, but with BPF_JIT.

From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>

When CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL is not set, but CONFIG_BPF_JIT=y
the kernel build fails:
In file included from ../kernel/bpf/trampoline.c:11:
../kernel/bpf/trampoline.c: In function ‘bpf_trampoline_update’:
../kernel/bpf/trampoline.c:220:39: error: ‘call_rcu_tasks_trace’ undeclared
../kernel/bpf/trampoline.c: In function ‘__bpf_prog_enter_sleepable’:
../kernel/bpf/trampoline.c:411:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘rcu_read_lock_trace’
../kernel/bpf/trampoline.c: In function ‘__bpf_prog_exit_sleepable’:
../kernel/bpf/trampoline.c:416:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘rcu_read_unlock_trace’

This is due to:
obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_JIT) += trampoline.o
obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_JIT) += dispatcher.o
There is a number of functions that arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c is
using from these two files, but none of them will be used when
only cBPF is on (which is the case for BPF_SYSCALL=n BPF_JIT=y).

Add rcu_trace functions to rcupdate_trace.h. The JITed code won't execute them
and BPF trampoline logic won't be used without BPF_SYSCALL.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Fixes: 1e6c62a88215 ("bpf: Introduce sleepable BPF programs")
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
---
 include/linux/rcupdate_trace.h | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate_trace.h b/include/linux/rcupdate_trace.h
index d9015aac78c6..aaaac8ac927c 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate_trace.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate_trace.h
@@ -82,7 +82,14 @@ static inline void rcu_read_unlock_trace(void)
 void call_rcu_tasks_trace(struct rcu_head *rhp, rcu_callback_t func);
 void synchronize_rcu_tasks_trace(void);
 void rcu_barrier_tasks_trace(void);
-
+#else
+/*
+ * The BPF JIT forms these addresses even when it doesn't call these
+ * functions, so provide definitions that result in runtime errors.
+ */
+static inline void call_rcu_tasks_trace(struct rcu_head *rhp, rcu_callback_t func) { BUG(); }
+static inline void rcu_read_lock_trace(void) { BUG(); }
+static inline void rcu_read_unlock_trace(void) { BUG(); }
 #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU */
 
 #endif /* __LINUX_RCUPDATE_TRACE_H */
-- 
2.23.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists