[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzbEE9sGp=z6MUuFoR=1_Ma27p-nH5BkEN+p2j20mhJ3mQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 15:03:28 -0700
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Martynas Pumputis <m@...bda.lt>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] tools: bpftool: dump outer maps content
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 9:14 AM Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com> wrote:
>
> Although user space can lookup and dump the content of an outer map
> (hash-of-maps or array-of-maps), bpftool does not allow to do so.
>
> It seems that the only reason for that is historical. Lookups for outer
> maps was added in commit 14dc6f04f49d ("bpf: Add syscall lookup support
> for fd array and htab"), and although the relevant code in bpftool had
> not been merged yet, I suspect it had already been written with the
> assumption that user space could not read outer maps.
>
> Let's remove the restriction, dump for outer maps works with no further
> change.
>
> Reported-by: Martynas Pumputis <m@...bda.lt>
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com>
> ---
> tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
> index bc0071228f88..cb3a75eb5531 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
> @@ -739,10 +739,6 @@ static int dump_map_elem(int fd, void *key, void *value,
> /* lookup error handling */
> lookup_errno = errno;
>
> - if (map_is_map_of_maps(map_info->type) ||
> - map_is_map_of_progs(map_info->type))
> - return 0;
> -
this code path handles the error case when lookup fails, or am I
misreading it? It's fine to remove this restriction, but the commit
message is completely misleading. That whole dump_map_elem() code is a
bit confusing. E.g., what's the purpose of num_elems there?..
Also, can you please update the commit message with how the output
looks like for map-of-maps with your change?
> if (json_output) {
> jsonw_start_object(json_wtr);
> jsonw_name(json_wtr, "key");
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists