[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4db0675f-ddc3-188f-f1ab-cc6d85010955@isovalent.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 15:49:35 +0100
From: Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Martynas Pumputis <m@...bda.lt>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] tools: bpftool: dump outer maps content
On 04/09/2020 23:03, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 9:14 AM Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com> wrote:
>>
>> Although user space can lookup and dump the content of an outer map
>> (hash-of-maps or array-of-maps), bpftool does not allow to do so.
>>
>> It seems that the only reason for that is historical. Lookups for outer
>> maps was added in commit 14dc6f04f49d ("bpf: Add syscall lookup support
>> for fd array and htab"), and although the relevant code in bpftool had
>> not been merged yet, I suspect it had already been written with the
>> assumption that user space could not read outer maps.
>>
>> Let's remove the restriction, dump for outer maps works with no further
>> change.
>>
>> Reported-by: Martynas Pumputis <m@...bda.lt>
>> Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com>
>> ---
>> tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c | 4 ----
>> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
>> index bc0071228f88..cb3a75eb5531 100644
>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
>> @@ -739,10 +739,6 @@ static int dump_map_elem(int fd, void *key, void *value,
>> /* lookup error handling */
>> lookup_errno = errno;
>>
>> - if (map_is_map_of_maps(map_info->type) ||
>> - map_is_map_of_progs(map_info->type))
>> - return 0;
>> -
>
> this code path handles the error case when lookup fails, or am I
> misreading it? It's fine to remove this restriction, but the commit
> message is completely misleading. That whole dump_map_elem() code is a
> bit confusing. E.g., what's the purpose of num_elems there?..
>
> Also, can you please update the commit message with how the output
> looks like for map-of-maps with your change?
Ok, the function _is_ confusing and _I_ totally got confused. Dumping
outer maps is already supported and this patch is not needed (and as you
mentioned, it does not do what I expected and wrote). Sorry about that.
I'll send a clean-up for that function instead in v2, to avoid confusion
in the future. Thanks for the review!
Quentin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists