lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200908010806.innpkij2q7uf6s2p@skbuf>
Date:   Tue, 8 Sep 2020 04:08:06 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     kuba@...nel.org, f.fainelli@...il.com, vivien.didelot@...il.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: don't print non-fatal MTU error if
 not supported

On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 02:57:09AM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> Hi Vladimir
>
> In some ways, this has been good. A lot more DSA drivers now have MTU
> support and jumbo packet support.

Yes, I suspect this is because many people wanted to experiment with
jumbo frames anyway, and the warning in dmesg acted as a sort of
reminder that the infrastructure is there. If it weren't for this
pre-existing interest, I would have expected a patch that silenced this
warning sooner, and not from me (the switches that I have don't print
this message).

Thanks,
-Vladimir

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ