lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 8 Sep 2020 11:59:54 +0300
From:   Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@...dia.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
CC:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Maxim Mikityanskiy" <maximmi@...lanox.com>,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 06/10] net/mlx5e: Support multiple SKBs in a TX WQE

On 2020-09-04 01:46, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Sep 2020 14:00:18 -0700 Saeed Mahameed wrote:
>> +static inline void mlx5e_tx_wi_consume_fifo_skbs(struct mlx5e_txqsq *sq,
>> +						 struct mlx5e_tx_wqe_info *wi,
>> +						 struct mlx5_cqe64 *cqe,
>> +						 int napi_budget)
>> +{
>> +	int i;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < wi->num_fifo_pkts; i++) {
>> +		struct sk_buff *skb = mlx5e_skb_fifo_pop(sq);
>> +
>> +		mlx5e_consume_skb(sq, skb, cqe, napi_budget);
>> +	}
>> +}
> 
> The compiler was not inlining this one either?

Regarding this one, gcc inlines it automatically, but I went on the safe 
side and inlined it explicitly - it's small and called for every WQE, so 
we never want it to be non-inline.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists