[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <489a69c6-d288-4cb4-fe32-8d4bd6f37667@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 11:59:54 +0300
From: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@...dia.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Maxim Mikityanskiy" <maximmi@...lanox.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 06/10] net/mlx5e: Support multiple SKBs in a TX WQE
On 2020-09-04 01:46, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Sep 2020 14:00:18 -0700 Saeed Mahameed wrote:
>> +static inline void mlx5e_tx_wi_consume_fifo_skbs(struct mlx5e_txqsq *sq,
>> + struct mlx5e_tx_wqe_info *wi,
>> + struct mlx5_cqe64 *cqe,
>> + int napi_budget)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < wi->num_fifo_pkts; i++) {
>> + struct sk_buff *skb = mlx5e_skb_fifo_pop(sq);
>> +
>> + mlx5e_consume_skb(sq, skb, cqe, napi_budget);
>> + }
>> +}
>
> The compiler was not inlining this one either?
Regarding this one, gcc inlines it automatically, but I went on the safe
side and inlined it explicitly - it's small and called for every WQE, so
we never want it to be non-inline.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists