netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/5] tcp: only init congestion control if not initialized already

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:42:38 -0400
From:   Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
To:     Neal Cardwell <ncardwell.kernel@...il.com>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>, Kevin Yang <yyd@...gle.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/5] tcp: only init congestion control if not
 initialized already

On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 3:20 PM Neal Cardwell
<ncardwell.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
>
> Change tcp_init_transfer() to only initialize congestion control if it
> has not been initialized already.

Please ignore this v2 patch series.

My e-mails from ncardwell@...gle.com stopped being accepted at
netdev@...r.kernel.org mid-way through processing  the v2 patch series
(between patches 2 and 3), confusing patchwork about which patches
belonged to the v2 patch series. I tried resending the remaining
patches from gmail.com, but this confused patchwork about what patches
belonged to which series.

I have resubmitted the v2 patch series as patch series v3 entirely
sent from @gmail.com.

Here is v3; please use this one:
  https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=200962

thanks!
neal