[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5cfbe096-a422-4f7b-0829-01e609b68982@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 14:03:02 -0700
From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, jiri@...lanox.com, kuba@...nel.org,
corbet@....net, michael.chan@...adcom.com, luobin9@...wei.com,
saeedm@...lanox.com, leon@...nel.org, idosch@...lanox.com,
danieller@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [net-next v4 0/5] devlink flash update overwrite mask
On 9/10/2020 1:13 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
> Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 15:26:48 -0700
>
>> This series introduces support for a new attribute to the flash update
>> command: DEVLINK_ATTR_FLASH_UPDATE_OVERWRITE_MASK.
>
> I think you really need to get rid of BIT() usage in the UAPI
> header as Jakub mentioned.
>
Yep. I'll send a v5 with that and the 3 minor nits fixed up.
Thanks!
-Jake
Powered by blists - more mailing lists