[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200919020549.GA70998@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 23:05:49 -0300
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
To: Henry Ptasinski <hptasinski@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Corey Minyard <cminyard@...sta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: sctp: Fix IPv6 ancestor_size calc in
sctp_copy_descendant
On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 12:12:11AM +0000, Henry Ptasinski wrote:
> When calculating ancestor_size with IPv6 enabled, simply using
> sizeof(struct ipv6_pinfo) doesn't account for extra bytes needed for
> alignment in the struct sctp6_sock. On x86, there aren't any extra
> bytes, but on ARM the ipv6_pinfo structure is aligned on an 8-byte
> boundary so there were 4 pad bytes that were omitted from the
> ancestor_size calculation. This would lead to corruption of the
> pd_lobby pointers, causing an oops when trying to free the sctp
> structure on socket close.
>
> Fixes: 636d25d557d1 ("sctp: not copy sctp_sock pd_lobby in sctp_copy_descendant")
> Signed-off-by: Henry Ptasinski <hptasinski@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
...
> {
> - int ancestor_size = sizeof(struct inet_sock) +
> - sizeof(struct sctp_sock) -
> - offsetof(struct sctp_sock, pd_lobby);
> -
> - if (sk_from->sk_family == PF_INET6)
> - ancestor_size += sizeof(struct ipv6_pinfo);
> + size_t ancestor_size = sizeof(struct inet_sock);
>
> + ancestor_size += sk_from->sk_prot->obj_size;
Heh, of course. Nice one.
> + ancestor_size -= offsetof(struct sctp_sock, pd_lobby);
> __inet_sk_copy_descendant(sk_to, sk_from, ancestor_size);
> }
>
> --
> 2.28.0.681.g6f77f65b4e-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists