lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:11:22 -0400
From:   Stephen Suryaputra <ssuryaextr@...il.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, dsahern@...il.com
Subject: ip rule iif oif and vrf

Hi,

We have a use case where there are multiple user VRFs being leak routed
to and from tunnels that are on the core VRF. Traffic from user VRF to a
tunnel can be done the normal way by specifying the netdev directly on
the route entry on the user VRF route table:

ip route add <prefix> via <tunnel_end_point_addr> dev <tunnel_netdev>

But traffic received on the tunnel must be leak routed directly to the
respective a specific user VRF because multiple user VRFs can have
duplicate address spaces. I am thinking of using ip rule but when the
iif is an enslaved device, the rule doesn't get matched because the
ifindex in the skb is the master.

My question is: is this a bug, or is there anything else that can be
done to make sure that traffic from a tunnel being routed directly to a
user VRF? If it is the later, I can work on a patch.

Thank you,

Stephen.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ