[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <73f3a117-7617-4655-b286-29c1385011b3@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 18:20:35 -0400
From: Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, mtosatti@...hat.com,
sassmann@...hat.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
jacob.e.keller@...el.com, jlelli@...hat.com, hch@...radead.org,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, mike.marciniszyn@...el.com,
dennis.dalessandro@...el.com, thomas.lendacky@....com,
jerinj@...vell.com, mathias.nyman@...el.com, jiri@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][Patch v1 1/3] sched/isolation: API to get num of
hosekeeping CPUs
On 9/22/20 5:26 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> Subject: Re: [RFC][Patch v1 1/3] sched/isolation: API to get num of hosekeeping CPUs
> Hosekeeping? Are these CPUs out gardening in the weeds?
Bjorn has already highlighted the typo, so I will be fixing it in the next
version.
Do you find the commit message and body of this patch unclear?
>
> Andrew
>
--
Nitesh
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists