netdev - Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v1 4/7] selftests: net: add a test for shared UDP tunnel info tables

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <808d485e3d63a2e10f1fba75c0cac968d8f844aa.camel@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Sep 2020 22:25:46 +0000
From:   "Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
To:     "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "Brown, Aaron F" <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>
CC:     "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v1 4/7] selftests: net: add a
 test for shared UDP tunnel info tables

On Mon, 2020-09-21 at 14:44 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Sep 2020 07:23:58 +0000 Brown, Aaron F wrote:
> > > From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces@...osl.org> On
> > > Behalf Of Jakub
> > > Kicinski
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2020 6:27 PM
> > > To: davem@...emloft.net
> > > Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org;
> > > Jakub Kicinski
> > > <kuba@...nel.org>
> > > Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v1 4/7] selftests:
> > > net: add a test for
> > > shared UDP tunnel info tables
> > > 
> > > Add a test run of checks validating the shared UDP tunnel port
> > > tables function as we expect.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> > > ---
> > >  .../drivers/net/netdevsim/udp_tunnel_nic.sh   | 109
> > > ++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 109 insertions(+)
> > >   
> > 
> > I ran into two things while running this script.
> > 1. The script as it exists in the git tree (Jeff Kirshers next-
> > queue) is not executable.  I don't know if that's a patch issue or
> > translation into the tree.  Easy enough to get around, but should
> > probably be executable to start.
> 
> Ah, good catch, thanks! Please adjust in your tree or I can send a
> follow up with other patches I still have queued.

Hi Jakub,

It'd be great if you could adjust and resend the series. As we're still
working through our email server issue, I don't know if everything
would make it here.

Thanks,
Tony