[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200928.160307.1327269757816527615.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 16:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: W_Armin@....de
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] lib8390: Replace panic() call with
BUILD_BUG_ON
From: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de>
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2020 21:56:59 +0200
> Replace panic() call in lib8390.c with BUILD_BUG_ON()
> since checking the size of struct e8390_pkt_hdr should
> happen at compile-time. Also add __packed to e8390_pkt_hdr
> to prevent padding.
>
> Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/8390/8390.h | 2 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/8390/lib8390.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/8390/8390.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/8390/8390.h
> index e52264465998..e7d6fd55f6a5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/8390/8390.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/8390/8390.h
> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ struct e8390_pkt_hdr {
> unsigned char status; /* status */
> unsigned char next; /* pointer to next packet. */
> unsigned short count; /* header + packet length in bytes */
> -};
> +} __packed;
This is completely unnecessary and hurts performance on some cpus as
__packed forces the compiler to be unable to assume the alignment of
any member of said data structure.
I'm not applying this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists