[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201001012410.GA4050473@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 03:24:10 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
Cc: "vivien.didelot@...il.com" <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: dsa: mv88e6xxx: serdes link without phy
> port@8 {
> reg = <8>;
> label = "internal8";
> phy-mode = "rgmii-id";
> fixed-link {
> speed = <1000>;
> full-duplex;
> };
> };
> port@9 {
> reg = <9>;
> label = "internal9";
> phy-mode = "rgmii-id";
> fixed-link {
> speed = <1000>;
> full-duplex;
> };
> };
>
> The problem is that by declaring ports 8 & 9 as fixed link the driver
> sets the ForcedLink in the PCS control register. Which mostly works.
> Except if I add a chassis controller while the system is running (or one
> is rebooted) then the newly added controller doesn't see a link on the
> serdes.
Hi Chris
You say SERDES here, but in DT you have rgmii-id?
Can you run 1000Base-X over these links? If you can, it is probably
worth chatting to Russell King about using inband-signalling, and what
is needed to make it work without having back to back SFPs. If i
remember correctly, Russell has said not much is actually needed.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists