lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2020 12:24:07 +0300 From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> Cc: Dave Ertman <david.m.ertman@...el.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Ancillary bus implementation and SOF multi-client support On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 11:10:36AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 12:04:52PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > > > I don't know why did you send this series separately to every mailing > > list, but it is not correct thing to do. > > > > RDMA ML and discussion: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rdma/20201001050534.890666-1-david.m.ertman@intel.com/T/#t > > Netdev ML (completely separated): > > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20201001050851.890722-1-david.m.ertman@intel.com/ > > Alsa ML (separated too): > > https://lore.kernel.org/alsa-devel/20200930225051.889607-1-david.m.ertman@intel.com/ > > Seems like the goal was to spread it around to different places so that > no one could strongly object or review it :( It took me time to realize why I was alone expressing my thoughts :). BTW, I'm looking on ALSA thread and happy to see that people didn't like "ancillary" name. It is far from intuitive name for any non-English speaker. Thanks > > greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists