netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/6] Ancillary bus implementation and SOF multi-client support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 3 Oct 2020 12:24:07 +0300
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Dave Ertman <david.m.ertman@...el.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Ancillary bus implementation and SOF multi-client
 support

On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 11:10:36AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 12:04:52PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > Hi Dave,
> >
> > I don't know why did you send this series separately to every mailing
> > list, but it is not correct thing to do.
> >
> > RDMA ML and discussion:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rdma/20201001050534.890666-1-david.m.ertman@intel.com/T/#t
> > Netdev ML (completely separated):
> > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20201001050851.890722-1-david.m.ertman@intel.com/
> > Alsa ML (separated too):
> > https://lore.kernel.org/alsa-devel/20200930225051.889607-1-david.m.ertman@intel.com/
>
> Seems like the goal was to spread it around to different places so that
> no one could strongly object or review it :(

It took me time to realize why I was alone expressing my thoughts :).

BTW, I'm looking on ALSA thread and happy to see that people didn't like
"ancillary" name. It is far from intuitive name for any non-English speaker.

Thanks

>
> greg k-h