[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201003093220.GA127713@kroah.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2020 11:32:20 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Dave Ertman <david.m.ertman@...el.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Ancillary bus implementation and SOF multi-client
support
On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 12:24:07PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 11:10:36AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 12:04:52PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > Hi Dave,
> > >
> > > I don't know why did you send this series separately to every mailing
> > > list, but it is not correct thing to do.
> > >
> > > RDMA ML and discussion:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rdma/20201001050534.890666-1-david.m.ertman@intel.com/T/#t
> > > Netdev ML (completely separated):
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20201001050851.890722-1-david.m.ertman@intel.com/
> > > Alsa ML (separated too):
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/alsa-devel/20200930225051.889607-1-david.m.ertman@intel.com/
> >
> > Seems like the goal was to spread it around to different places so that
> > no one could strongly object or review it :(
>
> It took me time to realize why I was alone expressing my thoughts :).
>
> BTW, I'm looking on ALSA thread and happy to see that people didn't like
> "ancillary" name. It is far from intuitive name for any non-English speaker.
It's not intuitive for a native-english speaker either :)
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists