netdev - RE: [PATCH 0/6] Ancillary bus implementation and SOF multi-client support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 5 Oct 2020 01:20:55 +0000
From:   "Ertman, David M" <david.m.ertman@...el.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
CC:     "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/6] Ancillary bus implementation and SOF multi-client
 support

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Sent: Saturday, October 3, 2020 2:11 AM
> To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
> Cc: Ertman, David M <david.m.ertman@...el.com>; linux-
> rdma@...r.kernel.org; linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>; alsa-
> devel@...a-project.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Ancillary bus implementation and SOF multi-client
> support
> 
> On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 12:04:52PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > Hi Dave,
> >
> > I don't know why did you send this series separately to every mailing
> > list, but it is not correct thing to do.
> >
> > RDMA ML and discussion:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rdma/20201001050534.890666-1-
> david.m.ertman@...el.com/T/#t
> > Netdev ML (completely separated):
> > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20201001050851.890722-1-
> david.m.ertman@...el.com/
> > Alsa ML (separated too):
> > https://lore.kernel.org/alsa-devel/20200930225051.889607-1-
> david.m.ertman@...el.com/
> 
> Seems like the goal was to spread it around to different places so that
> no one could strongly object or review it :(
> 
> greg k-h

This was my first time sending a patchset to more than one mailing list
and I screwed it up.

I will be sending a v2 soon (Monday maybe?) and I will be sending it to 
all CC's and mailing list in one send so that everyone will see everyone's
response.

Sorry for the mistake.

-DaveE.