lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 03 Oct 2020 17:05:38 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     kgraul@...ux.ibm.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, raspl@...ux.ibm.com,
        ubraun@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net/smc: send ISM devices with unique
 chid in CLC proposal

From: Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri,  2 Oct 2020 17:09:26 +0200

> When building a CLC proposal message then the list of ISM devices does
> not need to contain multiple devices that have the same chid value,
> all these devices use the same function at the end.
> Improve smc_find_ism_v2_device_clnt() to collect only ISM devices that
> have unique chid values.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>

Series applied, but could you send a proper patch series in the future
with a "[PATCH 0/N] ..." header posting?  It must explain what the
patch series does at a high level, how it is doing it, and why it is
doing it that way.

Thank you.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists