netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net/smc: send ISM devices with unique chid in CLC proposal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20201003.170538.1607088552412478587.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Sat, 03 Oct 2020 17:05:38 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     kgraul@...ux.ibm.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, raspl@...ux.ibm.com,
        ubraun@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net/smc: send ISM devices with unique
 chid in CLC proposal

From: Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri,  2 Oct 2020 17:09:26 +0200

> When building a CLC proposal message then the list of ISM devices does
> not need to contain multiple devices that have the same chid value,
> all these devices use the same function at the end.
> Improve smc_find_ism_v2_device_clnt() to collect only ISM devices that
> have unique chid values.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>

Series applied, but could you send a proper patch series in the future
with a "[PATCH 0/N] ..." header posting?  It must explain what the
patch series does at a high level, how it is doing it, and why it is
doing it that way.

Thank you.